Trump Called a Federal Judge a "So-Called Judge." He Called Another "Mexican" to Suggest Bias. Chief Justice Roberts Had to Publicly Rebuke Him.

Federal judges are appointed for life specifically to insulate them from political pressure. The idea is that law should not depend on who the president is. Trump has attacked this principle consistently and specifically: calling Judge James Robart a "so-called judge" for blocking the Muslim ban; arguing that Judge Gonzalo Curiel couldn't be impartial because he was "Mexican"; prompting Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare public statement rejecting the idea of "Obama judges" and "Trump judges." In his second term, he has moved from rhetoric to action — defying court orders, threatening judges with impeachment, and having the DOJ investigate judges who ruled against him.

← all posts

"The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!"

— Donald Trump, tweet, February 4, 2017, referring to U.S. District Judge James Robart — a George W. Bush appointee — who had blocked Trump's Muslim ban

Judge Robart was appointed by George W. Bush and confirmed 99-0 by the Senate. He issued a temporary restraining order blocking Trump's executive order on travel from seven Muslim-majority countries based on constitutional concerns. Trump responded by calling him a "so-called judge" — implying his rulings and authority were not legitimate. The American Bar Association, the Federalist Society, and legal scholars across the ideological spectrum noted that attacking the personal legitimacy of a judge for issuing a ruling is corrosive to the rule of law. The Ninth Circuit upheld Robart's order. A different version of the ban was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court.

During the 2016 campaign, Trump claimed that Judge Gonzalo Curiel — who was presiding over the Trump University fraud lawsuit — could not be impartial because Curiel was "Mexican." Curiel was born in Indiana. He is an American citizen. Trump's argument was that Curiel's ethnic heritage made him incapable of rendering fair legal judgment. House Speaker Paul Ryan, asked about this, called it "the textbook definition of a racist comment." Trump did not retract it.

"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."

— Chief Justice John Roberts, November 21, 2018, in a rare public statement issued in direct response to Trump calling a judge ruling against him an "Obama judge"

Roberts's statement was extraordinary — Chief Justices rarely make public statements about political disputes. That he felt compelled to do so after Trump's "Obama judge" comment reflects the degree to which Trump's attacks on judicial independence were seen as genuinely threatening institutional norms. Trump tweeted back at Roberts, saying his statement was "not very responsible." In his second term, the attacks became operational: defying court orders, suggesting judges should face impeachment for rulings he disagreed with, and DOJ investigations of specific judges.

Verification note

This post distinguishes between documented facts, allegations, and analysis. Where motive, intent, corruption, or illegality remains disputed in the public record, the text attributes that judgment to court findings, official records, direct quotes, or the reporting linked below.

The Sources
  • "So-called judge" tweet — February 4, 2017; archived; Judge Robart confirmed 99-0 by Senate.
  • Curiel "Mexican" — CNN interview, Jake Tapper, June 2016; Ryan "textbook racist" comment documented.
  • Roberts statement — November 21, 2018; issued through Supreme Court Public Information Office; rare public intervention.
  • Trump response to Roberts — tweet, November 21, 2018.
related (second term)← Defying 96 Court Orders: Constitutional Crisis.relatedSCOTUS: Presidents Are Now Kings. →