ICE Violated 96 Court Orders. A Judge Said It's the Most in US History.

← all posts

Judge Patrick Schiltz is a George W. Bush appointee — not a Biden liberal, not a Democrat plant. In late February 2026, after reviewing the record in his district, he documented 96 court order violations by ICE across 74 separate cases in January 2026 alone. His conclusion: ICE "has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence." He threatened criminal contempt. He said the judges of his district had been "extraordinarily patient" and were "not aware of another occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten contempt — again and again and again — to force the United States government to comply with its orders." That's a Bush judge. That's not hyperbole. That's a federal court record.

The Planes Flew While the Judge Was Still Talking.

On March 15, 2025, as Judge James Boasberg was actively conducting a hearing on the Alien Enemies Act deportations, deportation flights carrying Venezuelan men to El Salvador's CECOT prison were already in the air. Boasberg issued a verbal order from the bench: turn the planes around. The administration allowed the flights to continue. When Boasberg asked the government's DOJ attorney whether flights were underway, the attorney said he didn't know. He knew. The planes landed. On April 15, Boasberg found probable cause that the administration had acted in contempt. He quoted the Constitution directly in his ruling: "The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders — especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it." Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached. His administration sued every judge on the Maryland district court.

The Contempt Spiral.

Federal judges in Minnesota actually followed through — twice — and held the administration in civil contempt. In one case, the government released a wrongly detained immigrant but kept his cash, phone, driver's license, passport, and work permit. In another, a judge ordered the administration not to transfer a detainee out of Minnesota while his habeas petition was pending. The administration transferred him to Texas anyway, then released him in Texas, forcing his lawyer to pay $568.29 out of pocket for a plane ticket home. The judge ordered the administration to reimburse the $568.29. A New York Times analysis found at least 35 contempt-related orders issued against the administration since August 2025. The pattern is consistent: the administration violates the order, gets caught, offers minimal compliance, and waits for the next case.

The Enforcement Problem Nobody Wants to Say Out Loud.

Here's the problem the courts are circling around without quite saying directly: the enforcement arm of the federal courts is the US Marshals Service, which is part of the Department of Justice, which is controlled by the president. If Trump ordered the Marshals not to enforce contempt orders against his own officials — a scenario retired federal judge Nancy Gertner described as a "full-on constitutional crisis" — the courts would have to deputize other law enforcement to do it. Sheriffs. Local police. Court security officers. That has essentially never happened in American history. Constitutional law scholar Aziz Huq framed the deeper danger: "Once you have the President saying, 'I don't need to follow a court order' — what about governance? What about sheriffs? What about state legislatures or state judges? Why do they need to follow court orders?" The answer he's describing is: they don't. And that's not America. That's the end of America.